Contact us
Thank you for your interest!
we will contact you ASAP
Nowadays, digital accessibility has become a fundamental principle for all companies that understand that user needs always come first. In this sense, the key aspect is accessibility and equal access for all people, eliminating any form of discrimination on any grounds.
35 years ago, in 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became a law. And it is America’s most important law regarding accessibility and civil rights for people with disabilities, including web accessibility.
As web interaction has become fundamental to our daily lives, web accessibility is essential. Having a website that is inaccessible to certain users, that is not ADA compliant, and that creates unfair digital barriers for people with disabilities, will be a major problem for any company operating online today.
The problem is also a legal one, as the number of lawsuits related to website non-compliance with ADA requirements continues to rise. According to UsableNet's report, 4,065 lawsuits were filed in 2023 due to web accessibility issues. This represents a 42% increase compared to 2022 and an astonishing nearly 400% (!) increase since 2017. A similar upward trend persisted throughout 2024, with thousands of lawsuits filed against owners of fully or partially inaccessible websites.
So, digital accessibility and compliance with ADA requirements are very important.
Inaccessible web content means that people with disabilities are deprived of equal access to information. An inaccessible website can exclude people just as much as steps at the entrance to a physical location.
In recent years, numerous services have moved online, and people rely on websites for all aspects of daily life more than ever before.
People with disabilities navigate the web in a variety of ways. People who are blind may use screen readers, which are devices that speak the text that appears on a screen. People who are deaf or hard of hearing may use captioning. And people whose disabilities affect their ability to grasp and use a mouse may use voice recognition software to control their computers and other devices with verbal commands.
If the ways that websites are designed and set up can create unnecessary barriers that make it difficult or impossible for people with disabilities to use websites, such websites are not accessible.
When they talk about the ADA requirements, they usually refer to two sources. First, the text of the ADA, also referred to as the ADA statute, passed by Congress in 1990 and later amended. Second, regulations developed by the Department of Justice that state/local governments and many businesses must follow to ensure that they do not discriminate against people with disabilities.
The latest such changes were made public on April 24, 2024, when the Federal Register published the Department of Justice’s (Department) final rule updating its regulations for Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The rule sets technical requirements for state and local governments to follow to make sure that their websites and mobile apps are accessible to people with disabilities. This webinar provides a summary of the rule: https://youtu.be/hkhIGSvJC2o
The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in employment, state and local government, public accommodations, commercial facilities, transportation, and telecommunications. It also applies to the United States Congress.
To be protected by the ADA, one must have a disability or have a relationship or association with an individual with a disability. An individual with a disability is defined by the ADA as a person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, a person who has a history or record of such an impairment, or a person who is perceived by others as having such an impairment. The ADA does not specifically name all of the impairments that are covered.
There’s a common misconception that the ADA only applies to very large corporations, but that’s a serious mistake. All types and all sizes of businesses have to comply with ADA legislation, as it pertains to their customers and their employees. Organizations exempt from complying with the ADA are those with fewer than 15 employees. That means that the ADA affects:
The Americans with Disabilities Act applies to state and local governments (Title II) and businesses that are open to the public (Title III).
Ultimately, all websites should be ADA compliant and inclusive to everyone – even if the ADA standards don’t apply to you and your organization.
Because ADA applies to all electronic information and technology, i.e., the World Wide Web and all its websites, ADA compliance applies to virtually all businesses and web developers.
Some examples include:
The key requirements of the Department of Justice (DOJ) Web and Mobile Accessibility Rules, released in April 2024, are as follows:
Requirement: The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Version 2.1, Level AA is the technical standard for state and local governments’ web content and mobile apps.
You can find more information about why the Department picked WCAG 2.1, Level AA as the technical standard for state and local governments’ web content and mobile apps in the rule in the section of the appendix called “Technical Standard—WCAG 2.1 Level AA.”
Learn more about WCAG in our blog: WCAG: WCAG: A Comprehensive Guide to Web Accessibility Standards
Requirement: State and local governments’ web content usually needs to meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA.
The rule applies to web content that a state or local government provides or makes available. This includes when a state or local government has an arrangement with someone else who provides or makes available web content for them.
Example: If a county web page lists the addresses and hours of operation for all county parks, that web page must meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA even if a local web design company made the web page and updates it for the county.
Requirement: State and local governments’ mobile apps usually need to meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA
The rule applies to mobile apps that a state or local government provides or makes available. This includes when a state or local government has an arrangement with someone else who provides or makes available a mobile app for them.
Example: If a city lets people pay for public parking using a mobile app, that mobile app must meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA even if the app is run by a private company.
Exceptions: In limited situations, some kinds of web content and content in mobile apps do not have to meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA.
It is important that state and local governments can prioritize so they can choose the most important content - like current or commonly used information - to make accessible to people with disabilities quickly.
There are limited exceptions for some kinds of content that are not as frequently used or that may be particularly hard for state and local governments to address right away.
If an exception applies to certain content, it means that content would not have to meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA.
1. Archived web content
State and local governments’ websites often include a lot of content that is not currently used. This information may be outdated, not needed, or repeated somewhere else. Sometimes, this information is archived on the website.
Web content that meets all four of the following points would not need to meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA:
Example: A water quality report from 1998 that a state has stored in an “archive” section of its website and has not updated would probably fall under the exception. The exception would also probably apply to handwritten research notes or photos that go with the 1998 water quality report that the state scans and posts to its website in the archive section.
2. Preexisting conventional electronic documents
Some state and local governments have a lot of old documents, like PDFs, on their website. It can sometimes be hard to make these documents meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA.
Documents that meet both of the following points usually do not need to meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA, except in some situations:
Example: This exception would probably apply to a PDF flyer for a Thanksgiving Day parade posted on a town’s website in 2018, or a Microsoft Word version of a sample ballot for a school board election posted on a school district’s website in 2014.
When the exception does not apply: Documents that are currently being used to apply for, access, or participate in a state or local government’s services, programs, or activities do not fall under the exception even if the documents were posted before the date the government has to comply with the rule.
3. Content posted by a third party where the third party is not posting due to contractual, licensing, or other arrangements with a public entity
Third parties sometimes post content on state and local governments’ websites or mobile apps. Third parties are members of the public or others who are not controlled by or acting for state or local governments. The state or local government may not be able to change the content third parties post.
Content that is posted by third parties on a state or local government’s website or mobile app would not need to meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA.
Example: A message that a member of the public posts on a town’s online message board would probably fall under the exception.
4. Individualized documents that are password-protected
State and local governments sometimes use password-protected websites to share documents that are for specific individuals, like a water or tax bill. It might be hard to make all of these documents accessible right away for everyone, and there might not be a person with a disability who needs access to these documents.
Documents that meet all three of the following points do not need to meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA:
Example: A PDF version of a water bill for a person’s home that is available in that person’s secure account on a city’s website would probably fall under the exception. However, the exception does not apply to the city’s website itself.
5. Preexisting social media posts
For many state and local governments, making all of their past social media posts accessible may be impossible. There also may be very little use to making these old posts accessible because they were usually intended to provide updates about things happening at the time they were posted in the past.
For these reasons, social media posts made by a state or local government before the date the state or local government must comply with this rule do not need to meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA.
Example: This exception would apply to a 2017 social media post by a city’s sanitation department announcing that trash collection would be delayed due to a snowstorm.
Examples of what businesses should do to make websites accessible include (but are not limited to) the following practices:
Sometimes a state or local government tries to have two versions of the same web content or content in a mobile app: one version that is not accessible and another version that is accessible and provides all the same information and features. The second version is called a “conforming alternate version.”
Usually state and local governments should not have a main web page that is inaccessible and a separate accessible version of the same content, because people with disabilities should get equal access to that content on the same page.
Under the rule, state and local governments may use conforming alternate versions as an alternative to inaccessible content only in very limited circumstances. State and local governments are allowed to do this only when there is a technical or legal limitation that prevents inaccessible web content or mobile apps from being made accessible.
For more information about conforming alternate versions and when they are allowed, see the final rule in the section of the appendix called “Section 35.202 Conforming Alternate Versions.”
State and local governments must make sure that their web content and mobile apps meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA within two or three years of when the rule was published on April 24, 2024, depending on their population.
State and local government size | Compliance date |
0 to 49,999 persons | April 26, 2027 |
Special district governments | April 26, 2027 |
50,000 or more persons | April 24, 2026 |
Presenting a website that does not comply with the ADA presents people with certain disabilities with unjust digital barriers. Discrimination is both morally wrong and a violation of federal law. Therefore, those with non-compliant websites open themselves up to receiving ADA website compliance demand letters. Additionally, owners of non-compliant websites can potentially face more significant legal recourse, such as ADA website compliance lawsuits.
Web agencies need to keep ADA title III requirements in mind, too. If a client gets sued for having a non-accessible website, that client will turn to the agency that designed it. The client could insist on getting their money back, ruin that agency’s reputation for failing to comply with legislation, or even sue the agency for having created a non-ADA-compliant website.
If you want to find out if your website is ADA-compliant, conduct an audit, and most importantly, fix the issues, contact SmithySoft: we offer a full range of Accessibility Analysis services!
Thank you for your interest!
we will contact you ASAP